SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
KRISHAN PAHAL
ROHAN AND 2 OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Court No. - 91

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 41500

of 2021

Applicant :- Rohan And 2 Others

Opposite Party :- State of U.P.

Counsel for Applicant :- Rohit Shukla

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.

Heard Sri Rohit Shukla, learned counsel for the applicants as

well as learned AGA for the State appearing through Video

Conferencing and perused the material placed on record.

By means of the present bail application, the applicants-Rohan,

Umesh and Lallo seek bail in Case Crime No.716 of 2017,

under Sections 323, 324, 325, 504, 506, 308 of IPC, Police

Station- Chhata, District- Mathura, during the pendency of trial.

As per the prosecution story, the Informant lodged an NCR

against the applicants under Sections 323, 504, 506 IPC on

03.11.2017 at 11:30 PM alleging therein that the applicants

along with one Digamber are said to have assaulted their uncle

Sitaram. The said NCR was converted into an FIR which was

registered as Case Crime No.716 of 2017, under Sections 323,

324, 325, 504 and 506 IPC. The applicants along with co-

accused Digamber were released on bail in Case Crime No. 716

of 2017, under Sections 323, 324, 325, 504, 506 IPC vide order

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top