ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
,
KAMAL UPADHYAY AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS – Respondent
CRLP/11796/2022
Court No. - 48
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11796 of
2022
Petitioner :- Kamal Upadhyay And Another
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Rakesh Singh
Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Suneet Kumar,J.
Hon'ble Syed Waiz Mian,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned
A.G.A.
Present writ petition has been preferred for quashing the FIR
dated 09.07.2022 registered as Case Crime No.299 of 2022,
under Section 2/3 of U.P. Gangster and Antisocial Activities
(Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station Shamli, District- Shamli
and for a direction to the respondents not to arrest the
petitioners in pursuance of the aforesaid FIR.
Learned counsel for the petitioners vehemently contended that
only on the basis of solitary case, the proceeding under Section
2/3 of U.P. Gangster Act has been drawn, which is liable to be
set aside.
As has been propounded by Division Bench in Criminal Misc.
Writ Petition No. 4622 of 2019 (Somvir Vs. State of U.P. and
2 others) as well as in many judgments by this Court that even
a single case, if fulfills the category of offences given under
Section 2(b) (i) to (xv) of Act and is being committed by gang
defined under Section 2 (b) or gangster defined under Section 2
(c) of the Act may be basis for registration of case crime
number for offence punishable under Section 2/3 of Uttar
Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act,
1986. Therefore, the contention of petitioners that based on
solitary case, the imposition of Section 2/3 of U.P. Gangster Act
is not leviable, would have no bearing.
In view of the aforesaid dictum, even on the basis of solitary
case, the provisions of Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti Social
Activities (Prevention) Act 1986 can be imposed.
In the facts and circumstances of the case, no case has been
made out for interference with the impugned first information
report.
Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed leaving it open for the
petitioners to apply before the competent court for anticipatory
bail/ bail as permissible under law and in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 1.9.2022
Shivangi
Digitally signed by SHIVANGI
YADAV
Date: 2022.09.05 10:54:25 IST
Reason:
Location: High Court of Judicature at
Allahabad
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.