SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SAMREEN PAWAR – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P – Respondent


Advocates:
['RAJESHWAR MISHRA', 'G A', '', 'YOGESH KUMAR MISHRA']

Court No. - 75

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL

APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 17359 of 2021

Applicant :- Samreen Pawar

Opposite Party :- State of U.P.

Counsel for Applicant :- Rajeshwar Mishra

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Yogesh Kumar Mishra

Hon'ble Ram Krishna Gautam,J.

Heard over anticipatory bail application, under Section 438

Cr.P.C., moved by the applicant- Samreen Pawar, in Case Crime

No. 1952 of 2020, under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, 506,

120-B I.P.C., Police Station- Indrapuram, District- Ghaziabad.

Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the accused-

applicant is innocent; he has been falsely implicated in this very

case crime number; co-accused Mahtab, Akhtar and Abdul

Gani, have been granted anticipatory bail by Session Court

itself; applicant had entered in inter religion marriage, owing to

which, this false implication has been made; applicant is ready

to cooperate with the investigation; there is every likelihood of

arrest by the police; hence anticipatory bail application was

moved before court concerned, but it was rejected, hence this

application for anticipatory bail with above prayer.

Learned AGA as well as learned coun

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top