HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
RAM KRISHNA GAUTAM
LOKENDRA – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
BAIL/42290/2021
BAIL - 395, 342, 412, 120-B, 420 I.P.C. - Accused-applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated - Neither named in FIR nor apprehended on spot at time of alleged recovery - Name surfaced on basis of confessional statement of co-accused who has been enlarged on bail - Bail granted.
Fact of the Case:
Applicant, Lokendra, was arrested and charged under Sections 395, 342, 412, 120-B, and 420 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly committing robbery. The applicant claimed innocence and argued that he was falsely implicated in the case. He was not named in the FIR and was not apprehended at the spot of the alleged recovery. His name was added to the case based on the confessional statement of a co-accused who has since been released on bail.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the applicant was not named in the FIR and was not apprehended at the spot of the alleged recovery. The court also noted that the applicant's name was added to the case based on the confessional statement of a co-accused who has since been released on bail. The court found that a case for bail was made out.
Issues: Whether the applicant was entitled to bail.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the applicant was entitled to bail because he was not named in the FIR, was not apprehended at the spot of the alleged recovery, and his name was added to the case based on the confessional statement of a co-accused who has since been released on bail.
Final Decision: The court allowed the bail application and ordered the release of the applicant on bail.
Court No. - 83
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 42290
of 2021
Applicant :- Lokendra
Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Ashok Kumar Singh,Pratibha Singh
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ram Krishna Gautam,J.
Heard over bail application moved by applicant, Lokendra, in
Case Crime No. 246 of 2020, under Sections- 395, 342, 412,
120-B, 420 I.P.C., P.S. Pilua, District- Etah.
Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the accused-
applicant is innocent; he has been falsely implicated in this very
case crime number and is languishing in jail since 2.12.2020; he
is of four criminal antecedents, wherein, he is on bail, as has
been explained by him in affidavit filed in support of bail
application; there is no likelihood of fleeing from course of
justice or tempering with evidence in case of release on bail;
applicant was neither named in first information report nor was
apprehended on spot at the time of alleged recovery and his
name was surfaced on the basis of confessional statement of co-
accused and the co-accused has been enlarged on bail in this
very case crime number by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court.
Hence, bail has been prayed for.
Learned AGA has vehemently opposed but could not oppose
this fact that applicant was neither named in first information
report nor there was any recovery from him and his name was
there in the confessional statement of co-accused apprehended,
subsequently.
Having heard learned counsels for both sides and gone through
materials placed on record as well as considering all above facts
and circumstances, the nature of accusations, severity of the
punishment in the case of conviction and nature of supporting
evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with the
witness and prima facie case, but, without commenting on
merits of the case, a case for bail is made out.
Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.
Let the applicant, Lokendra, involved in above mentioned case
crime number be released on bail, on his executing a personal
bond and two reliable sureties, each, in the like amount, to the
satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following
conditions:
1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence.
2. The applicant will not indulge in any criminal activity.
3. The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution
witnesses and co-operate in the trial.
4. The applicant will appear regularly on each and every date
fixed by the trial court, unless his personal appearance is
exempted through counsel by the court concerned.
5. The party shall file computer generated copy of such order
downloaded from the official website of High Court, Allahabad.
6. The computer generated copy of such order shall be self
attested by counsel of the party concerned.
7. The concerned Court/ Authority/ Official shall verify the
authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the
official website of High Court, Allahabad, and shall make a
declaration of such verification in writing.
In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the
court below will be at liberty to proceed to cancel his bail.
Order Date :- 11.1.2022
Kamarjahan
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.