SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
VIJAY PRATAP SINGH – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT. INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS ALLAHABAD AND 4 ORS – Respondent


Advocates:
['P K UPADHYAY', '', 'RADHA KANT OJHA', 'D M TRIPATHI', 'SHRI RADHA KANT OJHA', 'C S C', '', 'RAJ KUMAR MISHRA']

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

***

ORDER

1. Order dated July 26, 2018 passed by the learned Single Judge has

been impugned by filing the present intra-court appeal. The order reads :

"1. Learned counsel for petitioner could not dispute that

dispute raised in present writ petition is squarely covered by

Division Bench judgment of this Court in Surendra

Kumar Srivastava vs. State of U.P. and others, 2007(1)

ESC 118.

2. In view thereof, no relief can be granted to petitioner.

Dismissed accordingly. Interim order, if any, stands

vacated."

2. A perusal of the aforesaid order shows that the decision of

Division Bench of this Court in Surendra Kumar Srivastava vs. State

of U.P. and others, 2007(1) ESC 118 was relied upon to dismiss the

writ petition. The view expressed in the aforesaid Division Bench

Chief Justice's Court

Serial No. 312

SPECIAL APPEAL No. - 731 of 2018

(Arising out of Writ - A No. 40822 of 1994)

Through :- Mr. Radha Kant Ojha, Senior Advocate with Mr.

P.K. Upadhyay, Advocate

v/s

Through :- Mr. Ajit Kumar Singh, Additional Advocate

General,

Mr.

Sudhanshu

Srivastava,

learned

Additional Chief Standing Counsel and M

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top