ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR GUPTA
SARUK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UP – Respondent
BAIL/49536/2020
Court No. - 87
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 49536 of 2020
Applicant :- Saruk
Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Manoj Singh
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Suresh Kumar Gupta,J.
Sri Sachchidanad Tiwari, Advocate filed vakalatnama on
behalf of the complainant, which is taken on record.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A.
and perused the record.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that
the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated
in the present case due to some ulterior motive. He
further submitted that the victim is a consenting party, she
lived in relation ship with the applicant for about two
years. Learned counsel also submitted that the victim is a
major girl and on allegation of false promise of marriage,
false and frivolous FIR was lodged by the victim against
the applicant. It is further submitted that there is no sign
of any forceful sexual assault on the body of the victim in
the medical examination. He further submits that there are
no chances of applicant's fleeing away from the judicial
process or tampering with the prosecution evidence,
applicant has no previous criminal history and he is in jail
since 8.10.2020.
Learned A.G.A. and learned counsel for the complainant
vehemently opposed the prayer for bail. Learned counsel
for the complainant further submitted that the applicant
committed rape since last two years, at that time, victim
was minor and the applicant committed custodial rape
upon her about two years.
Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence,
complicity of the accused, severity of punishment and
submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, I am of
the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail.
Let the applicant, namely, Saruk involved in Case Crime
No. 207 of 2020, under Sections 366, 376, 120B IPC,
Police Station- Hapur Dehat, District- Hapur, be released
on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties
each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court
concerned with the following conditions;
(i)The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during
the trial.
(ii) The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the
prosecution witness.
(iii)The applicant will appear before the trial court on the
date fixed.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court
below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail.
Order Date :- 13.1.2021
Ankita
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.