ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR GUPTA
SARUK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UP – Respondent
Court No. - 87
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 49536 of 2020
Applicant :- Saruk
Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Manoj Singh
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Suresh Kumar Gupta,J.
Sri Sachchidanad Tiwari, Advocate filed vakalatnama on
behalf of the complainant, which is taken on record.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A.
and perused the record.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that
the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated
in the present case due to some ulterior motive. He
further submitted that the victim is a consenting party, she
lived in relation ship with the applicant for about two
years. Learned counsel also submitted that the victim is a
major girl and on allegation of false promise of marriage,
false and frivolous FIR was lodged by the victim against
the applicant. It is further submitted that there is no sign
of any forceful sexual assault on the body of the victim in
the medical examination. He further submits that there are
no chances of applicant's fleeing away from the judicial
process or tampering with the prosecution evidence,
applicant h
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.