SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR GUPTA
SARUK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UP – Respondent


Court No. - 87

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 49536 of 2020

Applicant :- Saruk

Opposite Party :- State of U.P.

Counsel for Applicant :- Manoj Singh

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon'ble Suresh Kumar Gupta,J.

Sri Sachchidanad Tiwari, Advocate filed vakalatnama on

behalf of the complainant, which is taken on record.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A.

and perused the record.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that

the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated

in the present case due to some ulterior motive. He

further submitted that the victim is a consenting party, she

lived in relation ship with the applicant for about two

years. Learned counsel also submitted that the victim is a

major girl and on allegation of false promise of marriage,

false and frivolous FIR was lodged by the victim against

the applicant. It is further submitted that there is no sign

of any forceful sexual assault on the body of the victim in

the medical examination. He further submits that there are

no chances of applicant's fleeing away from the judicial

process or tampering with the prosecution evidence,

applicant h

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top