ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
KRISHAN PAHAL
SONU – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
Court No. - 91
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 45073
of 2021
Applicant :- Sonu
Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Sushil Kumar Pandey
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
Heard Sri Sushil Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the
applicant, Sri Rajeev Trivedi, learned counsel for the informant,
learned AGA for the State through video conferencing and also
perused the material placed on record.
By means of the present application, the applicant- Sonu, seeks
bail in Case Crime No.435 of 2020, under Sections 457, 380,
411 IPC, Police Station- Jhinjhana , District- Shamli, during the
pendency of trial.
As per the allegations made in the FIR, the attempt to rob the
bank is said to have been made in the night of 12/13.09.2020,
but nothing could be taken from the Bank except the DVR of
C.C.T.V. Camera is said to have been stolen from it. Learned
counsel for the applicant has submitted that he has been falsely
implicated in the present case and the recovery of the said DVR
of C.C.T.V. Camera is alleged to have been made from the
possession of the applicant after lapse of about one year. The
occurrence is said to have been ta
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.