SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
KRISHAN PAHAL
SONU – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Court No. - 91

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 45073

of 2021

Applicant :- Sonu

Opposite Party :- State of U.P.

Counsel for Applicant :- Sushil Kumar Pandey

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.

Heard Sri Sushil Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the

applicant, Sri Rajeev Trivedi, learned counsel for the informant,

learned AGA for the State through video conferencing and also

perused the material placed on record.

By means of the present application, the applicant- Sonu, seeks

bail in Case Crime No.435 of 2020, under Sections 457, 380,

411 IPC, Police Station- Jhinjhana , District- Shamli, during the

pendency of trial.

As per the allegations made in the FIR, the attempt to rob the

bank is said to have been made in the night of 12/13.09.2020,

but nothing could be taken from the Bank except the DVR of

C.C.T.V. Camera is said to have been stolen from it. Learned

counsel for the applicant has submitted that he has been falsely

implicated in the present case and the recovery of the said DVR

of C.C.T.V. Camera is alleged to have been made from the

possession of the applicant after lapse of about one year. The

occurrence is said to have been ta

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top