SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SUKHRAM – Appellant
Versus
BOARD OF REVENUE AND 4 OTHERS – Respondent


Court No. - 7

Case :- WRIT - B No. - 1813 of 2020

Petitioner :- Sukhram

Respondent :- Board Of Revenue And 4 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar Singh,Ashwani

Kumar Mishra

Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Azad Rai

Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J.

Supplementary affidavit filed today be kept on record.

The petitioner had filed a suit under Section 229B of the U.P.

Zamindari Abolition & Land Reforms Act, 1950, on

24.12.2013. Thereafter, some report etc. were taken and

ultimately the Suit came up for hearing and was dismissed by

the Sub Divisional Officer on 18.6.2018. Dismissal was

essentially on the ground that the Suit was not maintainable

under Section 229B of the U.P.Z.A.& L.R. Act, after the

commencement of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. Thereafter,

the First Appellate Court and the Second Appellate Court also

dismissed the Appeals saying that the suit was not maintainable

under Section 229B of the U.P.Z.A.& L.R. Act after the

commencement of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. Certain

observations on merit were also made.

The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that

when the Suit itself was filed on 24.12.2013, the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top