SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SRI AADIRAM – Appellant
Versus
SRI PADAM SINGH AND OTHERS – Respondent
SAPL/202/2010



Court No. - 58

Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 202 of 2010

Appellant :- Sri Aadiram

Respondent :- Sri Padam Singh And Others

Counsel for Appellant :- Vivek Kumar Birla,Mithilesh Kumar

Shukla,Nitya Prakash Tiwari,Shyam Surat Shukla

Counsel for Respondent :- R.N. Sharma,A.K. Sharma

Hon'ble Chandra Kumar Rai,J.

Order on C.M. Withdrwal Application No.8 of 2022

Heard Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the

appellant and Mr. Divanshu Tiwari, learned counsel for the

respondents.

Appellant has filed an application for withdrawal for second

appeal.

Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection.

Withdrawal application is allowed.

In view of the statements of learned counsel for the appellant

and averments made in the affidavit filed in support of the

withdrawal application, second appeal is dismissed as

withdrawn.

Order on Second

Appeal

In view of order passed on withdrawal application, second

appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

Order Date :- 8.9.2022

PS*

Digitally signed by PRITI SHARMA

Date: 2022.09.08 17:17:18 IST

Reason:

Location: High Court of Judicature

at Allahabad

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top