ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
RAMESH CHANDRA AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER – Respondent
Court No. - 84
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 43185 of 2012
Applicant :- Ramesh Chandra And Others
Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another
Counsel for Applicant :- C.K. Parekh,Kumar Ankit Srivastava
Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt.Advocate,Ram Surat
Saroj
Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for applicant and learned AGA for
State.
2. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for
quashing of summoning order dated 03.08.2011 as well as
Complaint Case No. 1778 of 2009 (Lalmani vs. Virendra Pratap
and others), under Sections 406, 120B, 417, 418, 419, 420, 468,
504, 506 IPC.
3. It is settled law that at the time of passing a summoning order
on the basis of criminal complaint and statements recorded
under Sections 200 and 202 Cr.P.C. the Court concerned has to
make out an opinion that there was sufficient ground for
proceeding. However, as pointed out by learned counsel for
applicants, in impugned order the complaint has been
reproduced verbatim and there is no discussion about the
statements recorded under Sections 200 and 202 Cr.P.C., except
that, "Parivad Patra Me Dhara 200 Dn.Pr.Sn. Va Dhara 202
Dn.Pr.S
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.