1

RESERVED ON 07.12.2022

DELIVERED ON 22.12.2022

Court No. - 84

Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1459 of 2014

Revisionist :- Satish And Anr.

Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anr.

Counsel for Revisionist :- Kundan Rai

Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,Rahul Mehrotra

Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.

1.

Heard Sri Kundan Rai, learned counsel for revisionists

and Sri Paritosh Malviya, learned AGA for the State.

2.

The facts of the present case reveals that revisionists

herein had earlier faced trial being Sessions Trial No. 133

of 2005 for offences under Sections 498A and 304B IPC,

wherein by judgement and order dated 07.12.2006, they

were granted acquittal.

3.

Subsequently, the revisionists and four other accused

persons faced another trial wherein by the impugned

judgement and order dated 21.12.2013 passed by the

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Agra in Complaint

Case No. 2164 of 2013 (Pratap Singh vs. Satish and

others) they were convicted under Section 406 IPC and

Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act and were sentenced

imprisonment for two years' each along with fine of Rs.

5000/- under Section 406 IPC as well as one year each

along