ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SUKHVEER SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER – Respondent
CRLR 3283/2013
Court No. - 86
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 3283 of 2013
Revisionist :- Sukhveer Singh
Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another
Counsel for Revisionist :- M.A. Khan
Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,Bhuvnesh
Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.
Heard learned counsel for the revisionist, Sri Bhuvnesh Kumar
Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2, learned
A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
The present criminal revision has been filed with a prayer to set
aside the impugned judgement and order dated 01.10.2013
passed by Additional District Judge, Court No. 6, Bijnor and
confirm the order dated 12.10.2012 passed by Sub-Divisional
Magistrate, Chandpur under Section 145 Cr.P.C.
It is contended by learned counsel for the revisionist that while
passing the impugned order dated 01.10.2013, the Additional
District Judge has not considered the documentary evidence nor
perused the stay order of the civil Court and without applying
his mind set aside the order dated 12.10.2012 passed by SDM,
Chandpur.
I have perused both the orders dated 01.10.2013 and 12.10.2012
passed by Courts below.
There is no illegality in the order dated 12.10.2012 passed by
Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Chandpur, the same is hereby
confirmed and the order dated 01.10.2013 passed by the
Additional District Judge, Court No. 6, Bijnor is hereby
quashed.
Section 146 Cr.P.C. is hereby quoted below for ready reference:
"146. Power to attach subject of dispute and to appoint
receiver.-(1) If the Magistrate at any time after making the
order under sub-section (1) of section 145 considers the case to
be one of emergency, or if he decides that none of the parties
was then in such possession as is referred to in section 145, or
if he is unable to satisfy himself as to which of them was then in
such possession of the subject of dispute, he may attach the
subject of dispute until a competent Court has determined the
rights of the parties thereto with regard to the person entitled to
the possession thereof:
Provided that such Magistrate may withdraw the attachment at
any time if he is satisfied that there is no longer any likelihood
of breach of the peace with regard to the subject of dispute."
However, in case the revisionist is not satisfied with the same,
he may move an application before the Magistrate concerned
for revocable of the same as Section 146 Cr.P.C. itself provides
that any order under Section 146(1) Cr.P.C. can be withdrawn
by the Magistrate itself after having full satisfaction. In case
such an application is moved, the same shall be heard and
disposed of expeditiously by the Magistrate concerned.
With these observations, this revision is disposed of.
Order Date :- 21.4.2022
AKT
Digitally signed by ASHOK KUMAR
TRIPATHI
Date: 2022.04.26 11:42:52 IST
Reason:
Location: High Court of Judicature at
Allahabad
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.