SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
ZEESHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P THRU SECRETARY HOME GOVT. UP. LKNW. – Respondent


Court No. - 67

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 47884 of 2021

Applicant :- Zeeshan

Opposite Party :- State Of U.P Thru Secretary Home Govt. Up. Lknw.

Counsel for Applicant :- Irshad Ahmad,Ajay Kumar Pandey,Anurag Vajpeyi,Aushim Luthra

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Anand Mohan Pandey,Puneet Kumar Shukla,Rajiv

Lochan Shukla,Zafeer Ahmad

Hon'ble Rahul Chaturvedi,J.

Heard Sri Manish Tewary, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Aushim Luthra, learned

counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Rajiv Lochan Shukla, learned counsel for the

complainant learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record.

The applicant moved the present bail application through e-mode, seeking enlargement of bail

during pendency of his trial in exercise of power under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in case crime

no.42 of 2020, under Section 302 IPC , Police Station-Mainather, District-Moradabad. More

than two years, the applicant is languishing in jail since 22.02.2020.

Contention raised by the counsel that initially the FIR was registered on 20.02.2020 for the

incident said to have been taken place on 19.02.2020 under Section 307 IPC at relevant police

station at Mainather, District Moradabad agai

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top