SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
ZEESHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P – Respondent


Advocates:
['ANURAG PATHAK', '', 'SUDHIR KUMAR AGARWAL', 'HARSHIT PATHAK', 'RATISH KUMAR SINGH', 'G A']

Court No. - 29

Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 2460 of 2017

Appellant :- Zeeshan

Respondent :- State of U.P.

Counsel for Appellant :- Anurag Pathak,Harshit Pathak,Ratish

Kumar Singh,Sudhir Kumar Agarwal

Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.

Hon'ble Pankaj Naqvi,J.

Heard Sri Harshit Pandey, learned counsel for the appellant and

Sri Gambhir Singh, learned AGA.

This criminal appeal is preferred against the judgment/order

dated 29.04.2017 passed by Additional District and Sessions

Judge Court No. 3, in Special Case No. 570 of 2015 arising out

of Case crime no. 185 of 2015, under Section 377 of IPC and

3/4 PASCO Act, 2012 whereby appellant has been convicted

and sentenced under section 377 IPC to 7 years R.I, fine of Rs.

8,000/- and default sentence of three months.

It is submitted on behalf of the applicant that he has been

sentenced for 7 years for above offences and is languishing in

jail since 29.05.2015, i.e., about 6 years have been served by

him in jail, appeal is not likely to be heard in near future, he be

enlarged on bail.

Learned A.G.A could not demonstrate anything contrary to the

above submission.

Considering the submissions advanced on behalf of both the

sides, I direct the r

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top