ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
ZEESHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P – Respondent
Court No. - 29
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 2460 of 2017
Appellant :- Zeeshan
Respondent :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Appellant :- Anurag Pathak,Harshit Pathak,Ratish
Kumar Singh,Sudhir Kumar Agarwal
Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Pankaj Naqvi,J.
Heard Sri Harshit Pandey, learned counsel for the appellant and
Sri Gambhir Singh, learned AGA.
This criminal appeal is preferred against the judgment/order
dated 29.04.2017 passed by Additional District and Sessions
Judge Court No. 3, in Special Case No. 570 of 2015 arising out
of Case crime no. 185 of 2015, under Section 377 of IPC and
3/4 PASCO Act, 2012 whereby appellant has been convicted
and sentenced under section 377 IPC to 7 years R.I, fine of Rs.
8,000/- and default sentence of three months.
It is submitted on behalf of the applicant that he has been
sentenced for 7 years for above offences and is languishing in
jail since 29.05.2015, i.e., about 6 years have been served by
him in jail, appeal is not likely to be heard in near future, he be
enlarged on bail.
Learned A.G.A could not demonstrate anything contrary to the
above submission.
Considering the submissions advanced on behalf of both the
sides, I direct the r
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.