ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SHREE PRAKASH SINGH
SANUJ BANSAL – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
Court No. - 78
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 50329
of 2021
Applicant :- Sanuj Bansal
Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Anil Kumar Pandey,Rishabh Agarwal
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Sriprakash Tripathi
Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A.
for the State and perused the record.
This application has been moved with a prayer to release the
applicant on bail during the trial in Case Crime No.605 of 2021,
under Sections 308, 272, 273, IPC and Section 60-A of U.P.
Excise Act P.S.-Tajganj, District-Agra.
It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that
applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the
present case due to ulterior motive. He submits that as per the
version of the FIR, noxious liquor is to be administered by
selling out the pouch of liquor to the injured. He next submits
that licensee is Kamlesh Singh and present applicant is nothing
to do with the selling out the liquor. He further submits that
even injured in his statement recorded under Section 161
Cr.P.C. has not stated anything about the present applicant and
has not named him
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.