SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

RAHUL AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P – Respondent


Court No. - 78

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S

438 CR.P.C. No. - 19279 of 2021

Applicant :- Rahul And Another

Opposite Party :- State of U.P.

Counsel for Applicant :- Ganesh Shankar Dubey

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.

Heard Sri Ganesh Shankar Dubey, learned counsel for the

applicants and Sri Raj Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for the

State and perused the record.

The anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. has

been filed by the applicants Rahul and Gulab Chandra,

seeking anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest in Case Crime

No. 416 of 2021, under Sections 376-D, 323, 504, 506 IPC,

Police Station Soraon, District Prayagraj.

Learned counsel for the applicants argued that the present First

Information Report is a counterblast to a First Information

Report lodged by Ram Sawari under Sections 323, 504, 506,

354-Ka IPC and 3/4 POCSO Act, P.S. Soraon, Disrict Prayagraj

against Deepak, Deepu, Maksudan @ Makhanchu and Shyam

the son-in-law of the Maksudan. It is argued that Shyam who is

an accused in the said First Information Report, is the husband

of the first informant of the present case and as such

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top