SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
CHAMELA DEVI AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS – Respondent


Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:175954

Court No. - 49

Case :- WRIT - B No. - 3024 of 2023

Petitioner :- Chamela Devi And Another

Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Shrawan Kumar Pandey,Ankit Kumar

Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C,Azad Rai

Hon'ble Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.

Heard Sri Shrawan Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the

petitioners, Sri Anshul Nigam, learned Standing Counsel

representing respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and perused the record.

Notice on behalf of Gram Sabha has been accepted by Shri Azad

Rai, learned counsel for the Land Management Committee.

The instant writ petition has been filed, inter alia, for the following

relief:

"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding

the respondent No. 2 (Judicial Member Board of Revenue U.P. at Prayagraj)

to decide the Revision No. 247 of 2007-2008 (Rama Shankar Mishra and

another vs. Chamela Devi and others) under Section 333 of the U.P.

Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, within stipulated period

which is fixed by this Hon'ble Court."

The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he is

the respondent in the revisio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top