ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
VIVEK AGARWAL
RAHUL TIWARI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER – Respondent
Court No. - 49
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 40516 of 2014
Applicant :- Rahul Tiwari
Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another
Counsel for Applicant :- Dhirendra Kuamr Srivastav
Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Vivek Agarwal,J.
1. Sri Kshitij Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri
Nagendra Srivastava, learned AGA for the State.
2. This Application U/S 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed seeking
quashing of the impugned charge-sheet No.44/13 dated
05.03.2013 as well as entire Criminal Case No.1688 of 2013,
Case Crime No.412 of 2012, under Section 41 Cr.P.C. and
Section 411/414 IPC, Police Station-Mughalsarai, District-
Chandauli.
3. As per office report, service is not complete. Service cannot
be accepted through any Head-constable or constable in the
Office of an individual. There is recovery. Allegations of mala
fides are not substantiated. It may be a defense available to the
applicant, which may be raised during the trial at an appropriate
stage, but as recovery has been made from the present applicant
also, there is no justification for quashing of the proceedings in
the light of the decision of Supreme Court in case of State of
Haryana a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.