ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
VIVEK KUMAR SINGH
MUKESH CHAUDHARY – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
Court No. - 67
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 51918 of 2021
Applicant :- Mukesh Chaudhary
Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Surendra Kumar Tiwari,Vikas Tripathi
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Sanjay Singh, learned AGA-I,
appearing for the State and perused the material brought on record.
It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant
has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. It is next
contended that there is no evidence against the applicant and only on the basis of
suspicion applicant has been implicated. It is further argued that no one had seen
the applicant with the deceased at the time of incident. Nothing has been
recovered from the possession of the applicant or at his pointing out. Co-accused
Ram Lalit Rajbhar has already been granted bail vide order dated 1.12.2021 in
Crl. Misc. Bail Application No. 39150 of 2021, bail order is annexed at page 17
to 19 of the supplementary affidavit. Several other submissions in order to
demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant hav
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.