SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
AKSHAY PATEL – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. AND ANOTHER – Respondent


Advocates:
['ANIL KUMAR VERMA', '', 'Sr Advocate', 'G A']

Court No. - 87

Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 3269 of 2021

Revisionist :- Akshay Patel

Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another

Counsel for Revisionist :- Anil Kumar Verma,Sr. Advocate

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.

Heard Mr. Anil Kumar Srivastava, learned Senior Counsel

assisted by learned counsel for the revisionist and perused the

record.

The instant revisionist has been filed against the impugned

judgement and orders dated 01.11.2021 and order dated

15.11.2021 passed by learned Additional District and Sessions

Judge, Court No.14, Varanasi in Sessions Trial No.170 of 2021

(State of U.P. vs. Akshay Patel) arising out of Case Crime

No.1549 of 2019, under Section 302 IPC, Police Station Cantt.,

District Varanasi.

Learned counsel for the revisionist has submitted that the

incident took place in a highly crowed area but non of the

prosecution witnesses have been examined by the investigating

officer. According to prosecution case, the alleged incident

committed by revisionist by lathi, danda, but during

investigation, not a single weapon has been recovered by the

investigating officer. The investigating

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top