ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
VIVEK KUMAR BIRLA,SHREE PRAKASH SINGH
DINESH KUMAR MADDHESHIYA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS – Respondent
CRLP/12316/2021
Court No. - 52
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 12316 of
2021
Petitioner :- Dinesh Kumar Maddheshiya
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Pradeep Kumar
Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Birla,J.
Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.G.A.
This writ petition has been filed with the prayer to quash the
First Information Report dated 26.10.2021 registered as Case
Crime no. 415 of 2021, under Section 3(1) U.P. Gangster &
Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, P.S. Nichlaul,
District Maharajganj. Further prayer has been made not to arrest
the petitioner in the aforesaid case.
Learned counsel for the petitioner vehemently contended that
only on the basis of solitary case, the proceeding under Section
3(1) of U.P. Gangster Act has been drawn, which is liable to be
set aside.
As has been propounded by Division Bench in Criminal Misc.
Writ Petition No. 4622 of 2019 (Somvir Vs. State of U.P. and
2 others) as well as in many judgments by this Court that even
a single case, if fulfills the category of offences given under
Section 2(b) (i) to (xv) of Act and is being committed by gang
defined under Section 2 (b) or gangster defined under Section 2
(c) of the Act may be basis for registration of case crime
number for offence punishable under Section 2/3 of Uttar
Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act,
1986. Therefore, the contention of petitioner that based on
solitary case, the imposition of Section 2/3 of U.P. Gangster Act
is not leviable, would have no bearing.
In view of the aforesaid dictum, even on the basis of solitary
case, the provisions of Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti Social
Activities (Prevention) Act 1986 can be imposed.
In the facts and circumstances of the case, no case has been
made out for interference with the impugned first information
report.
Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed leaving it open for the
petitioner to apply before the competent court for anticipatory
bail/bail as permissible under law and in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 20.12.2021
Ujjawal
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.