SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
JAWAHAR MISHRA and OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. and ANOTHER – Respondent


Advocates:
['SATENDRA KR GUPTA', 'GOVT ADVOCATE', '', 'BRAHMANAND TRIPATHI']

Court No. - 42

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 16280 of 2009

Applicant :- Jawahar Mishra And Others

Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another

Counsel for Applicant :- Satendra Kr. Gupta

Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,Brahmanand

Tripathi

Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.

1. List has been revised.

2. Heard Sri Kundan Mishra learned Advocate holding brief of

Sri Satendra Kumar Gupta learned counsel for the applicants

and the learned A.G.A. for the State.

3. None has appeared for the complainant.

4. Present application has been filed to quash the order dated

29.4.2009 passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division) Court No. 21

Deoria in Complaint Case No. 509 of 2007 (Santosh v. Tara

Shankar and Others) under Sections 147, 148, 323, 336, 504,

506 IPC, Police Station Khukhundu, District Deoria.

5. By the impugned order dated 29.4.2009 the learned court

below has issued process to the applicants to appear on the date

fixed.

6. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the case has a

chequered history. Earlier, upon complaint being filed by the

opposite party No.2, the applicants and six other persons were

summoned by order dated 17.9.1998. Upon objection raised by

the a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top