ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
AJIT KUMAR
DR. JAMSHED KHAN – Appellant
Versus
NAGAR NIGAM, BAREILLY – Respondent
A227/7598/2021
Court No. - 9
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7598 of 2021
Petitioner :- Dr. Jamshed Khan
Respondent :- Nagar Nigam, Bareilly
Counsel for Petitioner :- Amit Krishna,Hemant Kumar
Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
Heard Sri Amit Krishna, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri
Hemant Kumar, learned counsel for the contesting respondent-
defendants namely Nagar Nigam, Bareilly.
By means of this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution,
the petitioner has prayed for in the nature of temporary
injunction seeking to restrain the order as against the defendant
from carrying out any temporary injunction activity in respect
of already constructed hospital by the petitioner situate at Plot
No. 228/1 in the area known as Nagar Nigam, Bareilly.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the
situation has arisen to file this petition before this Court even
while his application for temporary injunction in O.S. No. 907
of 2021 is still pending because the respondent-authority, Nagar
Nigam, Bareilly have tried to interfere in the peaceful
possession of the petitioner despite having put in appearance in
the pending suit.
Per contra, it is argued by the learned counsel appearing for the
Nagar Nigam, Bareilly that in view of paragraph 9 of the plaint
allegations, it is apparent that no notice has been issued to the
petitioner to carry out any temporary injunction activity. He
submits that Nagar Nigam, Bareilly is an authority in the nature
of strain mentality which would not carry out any such activity
without putting any notice upon the affected party and hence he
submits that the present petition is misconceived and the
petitioner pursued the remedy of injunction vide application
paper 6C pending in the suit.
Be that as it may, since according to the plaintiffs, there is no
notice issued and he is yet under threat of temporary injunction
exercise being taken by the respondent-Nagar Nigam, Bareilly
and the Nagar Nigam, Bareilly have already put in appearance
in the suit. It would in itself to be fit that this petition stands
disposed of with the direction to the trial Court to conclude the
proceedings of temporary injunction under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2
of The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 within next six weeks
from the date of filing of a copy of this order along with
application and for a period of eight weeks or till the disposal of
temporary injunction application, whichever is earlier, the
parties are directed to maintain status quo in respect of existing
structure qua suit property.
Order Date :- 17.12.2021
SA
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.