SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SANJAY KUMAR KESHRI AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
BASANTLAL KESHRI – Respondent


Advocates:
['ASHISH KUMAR SINGH', '', 'AJAY KUMAR SINGH', 'MANOJ KUMAR MISHRA', 'ARVIND KUMAR RAI']

1

Court No. 7

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5962 of 2017

Petitioner:- Sanjay Kumar Keshri And Another

Respondent:- Basantlal Keshri

Counsel for Petitioner:- Ashish Kumar Singh, Ajay Kumar Singh, Manoj

Kumar Mishra

Counsel for Respondent:- Arvind Kumar Rai

Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

1. Heard Sri Manoj Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners and

Sri Arvind Kumar Rai, learned counsel for the respondent.

2. This petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of

India praying for quashing of the order dated 24.04.2017 passed by

Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Court No. 1, Varanasi in Misc.

Case No. 28 of 2015 and the award dated 23.11.2013 passed by National

Lok Adalat / Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Court No. 1,

Varanasi in O.S. No. 274 of 2011.

3. The facts in brief stated in the petition are that plaintiff-respondent filed

O.S. No. 274 of 2011 (Basantlal Keshri Vs. Sanjay Kumar Keshri and

Another) for the decree of permanent injunction restraining defendants

from interfering in sole ownership and possession of plaintiff over

property in question nor take its forcible possession. Subject matter of

dispute is Arazi No. 167, area 9 de

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top