ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
KRISHAN PAHAL
DAYA SAROJ @ SAHAB LAL – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
Court No. - 77
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 54872
of 2021
Applicant :- Daya Saroj @ Sahab Lal
Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Ashutosh Kumar Srivastava,Rajeev
Giri
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
Heard Sri Rajeev Giri, learned counsel for the applicant and
learned AGA for the State and also perused the material placed
on record.
By means of the present application, the applicant- Daya Saroj
@ Sahab Lal seeks bail in Case Crime No.33 of 2021, under
Sections 457, 380 and 411 IPC, Police Station- Chauri, District-
Bhadohi, during the pendency of trial.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the
applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. There
is no recovery of any ornaments from the possession of the
applicant and only some article has been recovered. The
criminal history of the applicant has been explained in para-7, 8
and 9 of the affidavit filed in support of the bail application.
The applicant has been arrested in Case Crime No.68 of 2021,
under Section 401/34 IPC and after the said arrest, he has been
nominated in 16 cases pertaining to almost same typ
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.