SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
KRISHAN PAHAL
DAYA SAROJ @ SAHAB LAL – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Court No. - 77

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 54872

of 2021

Applicant :- Daya Saroj @ Sahab Lal

Opposite Party :- State of U.P.

Counsel for Applicant :- Ashutosh Kumar Srivastava,Rajeev

Giri

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.

Heard Sri Rajeev Giri, learned counsel for the applicant and

learned AGA for the State and also perused the material placed

on record.

By means of the present application, the applicant- Daya Saroj

@ Sahab Lal seeks bail in Case Crime No.33 of 2021, under

Sections 457, 380 and 411 IPC, Police Station- Chauri, District-

Bhadohi, during the pendency of trial.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the

applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. There

is no recovery of any ornaments from the possession of the

applicant and only some article has been recovered. The

criminal history of the applicant has been explained in para-7, 8

and 9 of the affidavit filed in support of the bail application.

The applicant has been arrested in Case Crime No.68 of 2021,

under Section 401/34 IPC and after the said arrest, he has been

nominated in 16 cases pertaining to almost same typ

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top