ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
PIYUSH AGRAWAL,RAJESH BINDAL
ANIL KUMAR VYAS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS – Respondent
Chief Justice's Court
Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 2456 of 2021
Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Vyas
Respondent :- State of U.P. and others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Mr. Shams Uz Zaman, Advocate
Counsel for Respondent :- Mr. Ajay Prakash Paul, State Law Officer for
respondent No.1 and Mr. Pankaj Srivastava, Advocate for respondent No.2
Hon'ble Rajesh Bindal, Chief Justice
Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal, J.
The present petition is claimed to have been filed in public interest, seeking a
direction to the respondents for taking appropriate action against the commercial
activities in the form of pre-primary school in the residential area.
Learned counsel appearing for the respondents have raised preliminary objection
regarding maintainability of the present PIL contending that though the petition
is ostensibly filed in public interest, the petitioner has not made due disclosure
as required by sub-rule (3A) of Rule 1 of Chapter XXII of the Allahabad High
Court Rules, 1952, which was inserted in view of the judgment of the Supreme
Court in State of Uttaranchal v. Balwant Singh Chaufal and others, 2010
AIR SCW 1029.
A perusal of the petition shows that the petitioner has not compl
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.