SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
UTTAM CHANDRA AND 2 OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. AND 10 OTHERS – Respondent


Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:225752

Reserved on 23.11.2023

Delivered on 30.11.2023

Court No. - 48

1. Case :- WRIT - B No. - 3822 of 2023

Petitioner :- Uttam Chandra And 2 Others

Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 10 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Vaibhav Shandilya,Sr. Advocate

Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C,Awadhesh Kumar Singh,Sandeep

Kumar

2. Case :- WRIT - B No. - 3867 of 2023

Petitioner :- Aagyaram And 2 Others

Respondent :- Deputy Director Of Consolidation And 10 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Gulrez Khan,Rahul Kumar Jadaun,Sr.

Advocate

Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C,Sandeep Kumar

Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.

1.

The counsel for rival parties are in agreement that these

writ petitions could be decided without exchange of pleadings

since entire pleadings are on record and that matter involve

mainly legal issues.

2.

Both these writ petitions are arising out of a dispute

amongst family members with regard to a registered adoption

deed, an unregistered Will as well as compromise entered

between parties before Consolidation Authorities.

3.

It is not in dispute that land in dispute belongs to Brij

Nandan, who had two daughters, namely, Tri

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top