SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

LUCKNOW BENCH
MOHD. GULAM GAUS @ CHHOTU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. – Respondent


Court No. - 28

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 82 of

2023

Applicant :- Mohd. Gulam Gaus @ Chhotu

Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Counsel for Applicant :- Shishir Pradhan

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon'ble Mrs. Renu Agarwal,J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the

State and perused the record.

The present application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. has been

filed seeking bail in Case Crime No.0476 of 2021, under

Sections 2/3 of the U.P. Gangsters & Anti Social Activities

(Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station Unchahar, District

Raebareli.

Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submitted that

according to the gang-chart (Annexure No.2), three cases have

been shown against the accused-applicant, in which he has been

enlarged on bail. Copy of the bail orders annexed with the

affidavit filed in support of the bail application. The applicant is

languishing in jail since 10.08.2021, therefore, the accused-

applicant may be enlarged on bail.

On the other hand, learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for

bail but could not dispute the aforesaid fact as argued by

learned counsel for the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top