LUCKNOW BENCH
MOHD. GULAM GAUS @ CHHOTU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. – Respondent
BAIL 82 2023
Court No. - 28
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 82 of
2023
Applicant :- Mohd. Gulam Gaus @ Chhotu
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.
Counsel for Applicant :- Shishir Pradhan
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mrs. Renu Agarwal,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the
State and perused the record.
The present application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. has been
filed seeking bail in Case Crime No.0476 of 2021, under
Sections 2/3 of the U.P. Gangsters & Anti Social Activities
(Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station Unchahar, District
Raebareli.
Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submitted that
according to the gang-chart (Annexure No.2), three cases have
been shown against the accused-applicant, in which he has been
enlarged on bail. Copy of the bail orders annexed with the
affidavit filed in support of the bail application. The applicant is
languishing in jail since 10.08.2021, therefore, the accused-
applicant may be enlarged on bail.
On the other hand, learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for
bail but could not dispute the aforesaid fact as argued by
learned counsel for the applicant.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and taking
into account that the accused-applicant has been enlarged on
bail in the case shown in the gang-chart and without expressing
any opinion on the merits of the case, it would be appropriate to
enlarge the accused-applicant on bail.
Let applicant Mohd. Gulam Gaus @ Chhotu be released on
bail in the above case crime number on his furnishing a
personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the
satisfaction of Court concerned with the following conditions :-
(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he
shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence
when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of
this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as
abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.
(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on
each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case
of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may
proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal
Code.
(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial
and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section
82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the
court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then the trial court
shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law,
under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the
trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii)
framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section
313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the
applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall
be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of
liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.
(v) The applicant shall also furnish an undertaking from the
sureties that the properties (movable/immovable) which are the
basis of accepting the surety, shall not be disposed of by them
till the conclusion of trial.
(vi) The applicant shall also give an undertaking to the effect
that he will not change his address without prior intimation to
the trial court.
(Mrs. Renu Agarwal,J.)
Order Date :- 5.1.2023
Zafar
Digitally signed by :-
MOHAMMAD ZAFAR ANSARI
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,
Lucknow Bench
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.