LUCKNOW BENCH
CHUNNU KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. (HOME), LKO. – Respondent
Court No. - 27
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 51 of 2023
Applicant :- Chunnu Kumar
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. (Home), Lko.
Counsel for Applicant :- Upendra Prakash Pathak
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.
Heard Sri Upendra Prakash Pathak, learned counsel for the
applicant, the learned AGA for the State and perused the
material placed on record.
By means of the instant applicant, the petitioner has prayed that
this Court be pleased to direct the learned Court below not to
insist the petitioner to file surety bond in each and every five
cases and accept only two sureties in lieu of all the five cases.
The learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that it
has become impossible for the applicant to submit surety in
each of case in which he has been granted bail. He added that
the applicant has been granted bail in five cases arising out of
following Case Crime Numbers :-
1) Case Crime No. 911 of 2021, under Sections 419, 420, 467,
468, 471, 411, 120B of the IPC and Section 66D of the IT Act,
2000, PS Kotwali Nagar, District Barabanki.
2) Case Crime No. 912 of 2021, under Sections 419, 420, 467,
468, 471, 411,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.