SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

LUCKNOW BENCH
SAMSUDDIN @ PINTU AJAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME, CIVIL SECTT. LKO. – Respondent


Court No. - 15

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 286 of 2023

Applicant :- Samsuddin @ Pintu Ajad

Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Civil

Sectt. Lko.

Counsel for Applicant :- Vivek Chandra

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon'ble Shamim Ahmed,J.

Heard Shri Vivek Chandra, the learned counsel for the applicant

and Shri Hari Shankar Vajpayee, the learned A.G.A.-I for the

state and perused the record.

This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the

applicant for directing the learned court below to enlarge the

applicant by accepting only two sureties and not to insist the

applicant to file separate surety bonds in each and every ten

cases and as mentioned in para-6 of the instant application.

It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant

that the applicant has been falsely implicated in ten criminal

cases and has been granted bail, the details of cases are as

under:-

1. Case Crime No. 457/ 2021, under Sections 380, 411 I.P.C.,

Police Station Sandhana, District Sitapur.

2. Case Crime No. 509/ 2021, under Section 459 I.P.C., Police

Station Sandhana, District Sitapur.

3. Case Crime No. 518/ 2021, under Section 307 I.P.C., Police

S

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top