SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

LUCKNOW BENCH
RAJ KUMAR AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME, LKO. AND OTHERS – Respondent


Court No. - 15

Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 190 of 2023

Revisionist :- Raj Kumar And Others

Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko.

And Others

Counsel for Revisionist :- Upendra Prakash Pathak

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon'ble Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I,J.

Heard Sri Upendra Prakash Pathak, learned counsel for the

revisionists, Sri Himanshu Suryavanshi, learned counsel for the

State and perused the entire record.

In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to opposite

party no.2 is dispensed with.

The instant criminal revision been filed by the revisionists for

setting aside the impugned order dated 08.11.2022 passed by

the learned Additional Session Judge (POCSO Act), Court No.45,

Barabanki in Case Crime No.312/2020, under Sections 363, 366,

376, 504 I.P.C. & 3/4 POCSO Act, Police Station Fatehpur, District

Barabanki, whereby the application dated 20.10.2022 moved by

the present revisionists came to be rejected.

Learned counsel for the revisionists has submitted that a first

information report came to be lodged against the revisionists by

the first informant as Case Crime No.312/2020, under Sections

363, 366, 376, 504 I.P.C. & 3/

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top