SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

LUCKNOW BENCH
MANOJ KUMAR SRIVASTAVA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME, LKO. – Respondent


Court No. - 15

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3072 of 2023

Applicant :- Manoj Kumar Srivastava

Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy.

Home, Lko.

Counsel for Applicant :- Arvind Tripathi,Atul

Kumar Chauhan

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon'ble Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I,J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned

A.G.A. for the State and perused the entire record.

The instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

has been filed by the applicant to direct the

learned court below not to insist the applicant to

file separate surety bonds in each and every

twelve cases and accept only two sureties.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant

that in twelve criminal cases bearing (i) Case

Crime No.1501 of 2019, under Sections 120B, 420,

409, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C., Police Station Gomti

Nagar, District Lucknow (ii) Case Crime No.1597 of

2019, under Sections 120B, 420, 409, 467, 468,

471 I.P.C., Police Station Gomti Nagar, District

Lucknow (iii) Case Crime No.807 of 2020, under

Sections 120B, 420, 409, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C.,

Police Station Gomti Nagar, District Lucknow (iv)

Case Crime No.808 of 2020, under Sections

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top