SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

LUCKNOW BENCH
MULAYAM YADAV – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. – Respondent


Court No. - 11

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5018

of 2023

Applicant :- Mulayam Yadav

Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Counsel for Applicant :- Ravi Kant,Akhilesha Nand

Pandey,Alok Pandey

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Ram Singh

Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for

the State and also perused the material placed on record.

The present bail application has been filed on behalf of the

applicant in Case Crime No.0025 of 2022, under Sections

323/325/307/452/504/506 I.P.C., Police Station- Katka, District-

Ambedkar Nagar, with the prayer to enlarge him on bail.

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that applicant is

innocent person and has been falsely implicated in the case, he

is having no previous criminal history and in jail since

27.09.2022. He further submitted that co-accused, namely, Om

Prakash Yadav has already been granted bail by Co-ordinate

Bench this Court, vide order dated 03.01.2023 passed in

Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.9913 of 2022. In these

circumstances, the applicant is also entitled for bail. In case of

being enlarged on bail, he wi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top