LUCKNOW BENCH
SHAMBHUNATH PATHAK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME AND ANOTHER – Respondent
Court No. - 13
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 4082 of 2023
Applicant :- Shambhunath Pathak
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home And
Another
Counsel for Applicant :- Anuj Dayal,Ankit Kumar Trivedi,Anuj Dayal
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Suresh Kumar Gupta,J.
(Order on Impleadment Application No. 1 of 2023)
1. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that due to
inadvertence he could not implead Ratnesh Pathak as a
necessary party in the array of applicants.
2. The application is allowed.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant is permitted to carry out
necessary amendments in the array of applicants during course
of the day.
(Order on Petition)
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. and
perused the record.
2. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to
opposite party no.2 is dispensed with.
3. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been
filed with the prayer to quash the impugned summoning order
dated 8.2.2023, bailable warrant order dated 27.3.2023 and
entire proceedings of Complaint Case No. 20/23/2022, under
Sections 498A,323,504 I.P.C. & Section 3/4 of t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.