SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

LUCKNOW BENCH
RAM SUMIRAN @ SUMIRAN AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIF SECY. REVENUE, LUCKNOW AND 8 OTHERS – Respondent


Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:43710

Court No. - 18

Case :- WRIT - B No. - 475 of 2023

Petitioner :- Ram Sumiran @ Sumiran And Others

Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chif Secy. Revenue, Lucknow

And 8 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Lakshmana Singh

Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh

Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.

1. Case called out in revised list. No one has put in appearance on behalf

of the petitioners to press this petition. However, learned counsel

representing side opposite is present in the Court.

2. It appears that the petitoners and the counsel engaged by the petitioners

both have lost the interest in the case and are not interested in pursuing the

petition.

3. It would be appropriate to refer two maxims:-

(i) Vigilantibus non dormientibus jura subveniunt (The law assists only

those who are vigilant, and not those who sleep over their rights); and

(ii) Interest reipublicae ut sit finis litium (In the interest of the society as a

whole, the litigation must come to an end).

The above said two maxims are sister provisions, which would highlight

and spotlight that the party seeking remedy before the Court should be

vigilant, otherwise, the law wo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top