LUCKNOW BENCH
RAM SUMIRAN @ SUMIRAN AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIF SECY. REVENUE, LUCKNOW AND 8 OTHERS – Respondent
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:43710
Court No. - 18
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 475 of 2023
Petitioner :- Ram Sumiran @ Sumiran And Others
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chif Secy. Revenue, Lucknow
And 8 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Lakshmana Singh
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh
Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.
1. Case called out in revised list. No one has put in appearance on behalf
of the petitioners to press this petition. However, learned counsel
representing side opposite is present in the Court.
2. It appears that the petitoners and the counsel engaged by the petitioners
both have lost the interest in the case and are not interested in pursuing the
petition.
3. It would be appropriate to refer two maxims:-
(i) Vigilantibus non dormientibus jura subveniunt (The law assists only
those who are vigilant, and not those who sleep over their rights); and
(ii) Interest reipublicae ut sit finis litium (In the interest of the society as a
whole, the litigation must come to an end).
The above said two maxims are sister provisions, which would highlight
and spotlight that the party seeking remedy before the Court should be
vigilant, otherwise, the law wo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.