LUCKNOW BENCH
MAN SINGH – Appellant
Versus
BOARD OF REVENUE,U.P. LUCKNOW THRU. CHAIRMAN AND 3 OTHERS – Respondent
Court No. - 18
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 528 of 2023
Petitioner :- Man Singh
Respondent :- Board Of Revenue,U.P. Lucknow Thru. Chairman And 3
Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinay Kumar Tiwari
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta
Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.
1. Case called out in revised list. No one has put in appearance on behalf
of the petitioner to press this petition. However, learned counsel
representing side opposite is present in the Court.
2. Even on the first date of listing dated 31.5.2023, no one appeared on
behalf of the petitioner to press the petition and the following order was
passed on that date:
"Case called out. No one appeared on behalf of petitioner. However,
learned counsel for the side opposite are present.
In the interest of justice, the case is adjourned for a day.
List in the month of July, 2023, as fresh."
3. It appears that the petitioner and the counsel engaged by the petitioner
both have lost the interest in the case and are not interested in pursuing the
petition.
4. It would be appropriate to refer two maxims:-
(i) Vigilantibus non dormientibus jura subveniunt (The law assists only
those who are vigilant, and not those who sleep
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.