LUCKNOW BENCH
BRIJ LAL AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
BOARD OF REVENUE U.P. LKO. THRU. CHAIRMAN AND 8 OTHERS – Respondent
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:55378
Court No. - 18
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 651 of 2023
Petitioner :- Brij Lal And Another
Respondent :- Board Of Revenue U.P. Lko. Thru. Chairman
And 8 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Manoj Kumar Mishra,Vikas Yadav
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh
Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.
1. Case called out in revised list. No one has put in appearance
on behalf of the petitioners to press this petition. However,
learned State counsel is present in the Court.
2. It appears that learned counsel for the petitioners is not
interested in pursuing the case.
3. It would be appropriate to refer two maxims:-
(i) Vigilantibus non dormientibus jura subveniunt (The law
assists only those who are vigilant, and not those who sleep
over their rights); and
(ii) Interest reipublicae ut sit finis litium (In the interest of the
society as a whole, the litigation must come to an end).
The above said two maxims are sister provisions, which would
highlight and spotlight that the party seeking remedy before the
Court should be vigilant, otherwise, the law would not come to
their help and there should be end to litigation.
4. Considering the aforesaid, this
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.