SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

LUCKNOW BENCH
BRIJ LAL AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
BOARD OF REVENUE U.P. LKO. THRU. CHAIRMAN AND 8 OTHERS – Respondent


Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:55378

Court No. - 18

Case :- WRIT - B No. - 651 of 2023

Petitioner :- Brij Lal And Another

Respondent :- Board Of Revenue U.P. Lko. Thru. Chairman

And 8 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Manoj Kumar Mishra,Vikas Yadav

Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh

Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.

1. Case called out in revised list. No one has put in appearance

on behalf of the petitioners to press this petition. However,

learned State counsel is present in the Court.

2. It appears that learned counsel for the petitioners is not

interested in pursuing the case.

3. It would be appropriate to refer two maxims:-

(i) Vigilantibus non dormientibus jura subveniunt (The law

assists only those who are vigilant, and not those who sleep

over their rights); and

(ii) Interest reipublicae ut sit finis litium (In the interest of the

society as a whole, the litigation must come to an end).

The above said two maxims are sister provisions, which would

highlight and spotlight that the party seeking remedy before the

Court should be vigilant, otherwise, the law would not come to

their help and there should be end to litigation.

4. Considering the aforesaid, this

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top