SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

LUCKNOW BENCH
MAHANT PRASAD RAM TRIPATHI @ M.P.R. TRIPATHI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. THRU. C.B.I. / A.C.B., LUCKNOW AND ANOTHER – Respondent


Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:56067

A.F.R.

Court No. - 16

Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 935 of 2023

Revisionist :- Mahant Prasad Ram Tripathi @ M.P.R. Tripathi

Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. C.B.I. / A.C.B., Lucknow

And Another

Counsel for Revisionist :- Prateek Tewari

Counsel for Opposite Party :- Shiv P. Shukla

Hon’ble Subhash Vidyarthi J.

1.

Heard Sri Prateek Tewari Advocate, the learned counsel for the

revisionist and Sri Shiv P. Shukla, the learned counsel for the Central

Bureau of Investigation and perused the records.

2.

This revision under Section 397/401 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the

revisionist challenging the validity of an order dated 25.05.2023,

passed by the learned Special Judge, C.B.I. Court No.4, Lucknow,

whereby the application under Section 227 Cr.P.C. praying for

discharge of the applicant has been rejected.

3.

Briefly stated, facts of the case are that one Haider Ali @ Mantu had

filed a complaint against one Shashi Mohan, Member, Fatehgarh

Cantonment Board, on the basis whereof Case No.RC0062015A0009

under Section 7 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 was registered

by the Central Bureau of Investigation on 09.05.2015. The

co

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top