SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

LUCKNOW BENCH
CHAMAN LAL DIWAKAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME CIVIL SECTT. LKO. AND OTHERS – Respondent


Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:80348-DB

Court No. - 10

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7065 of

2023

Petitioner :- Chaman Lal Diwakar

Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Civil

Sectt. Lko. And Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Shailendra Singh Rajawat,Shaquiel

Ahmad

Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.

Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.

Hon'ble Narendra Kumar Johari,J.

A request for adjournment has been made by learned counsel

for the petitioner.

Learned A.G.A. has produced instructions before this Court,

which show that the matter relates to Shine City Project

Investment plan where investigation is being carried out by the

Economic Offences Wing because of huge amount of money is

involved and more that 500 F.I.R.s have been registered.

Petitioner is not co-operating in the investigation. He was the

agent employed by the company who lured in unsuspecting

investors. During the course of the investigation, it has come

out that the petitioner was a Director in sister company, i.e.

Shine City Erector Pvt. Ltd. and the plot that was booked by the

informant was from his company, i.e. Shine City Erector Pvt.

Ltd. The informant had invested her

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top