Back
APPELLATE SIDE
T.S. SIVAGNANAM, HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, JJ
CENTRAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION & OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & OTHERS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of appeals against notification applicability. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding kmc's obligations under the epf act. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's observations on kmc's historical context. (Para 5 , 6 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. court's reaffirmation of procedural correctness and necessity for adjudication. (Para 8 , 18 , 19) |
| 5. conclusion affirming the applicability of epf act provisions. (Para 22) |
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J.)
1. These intra-Court appeals are directed against the order dated 18th May, 2018 in WP No. 197 (W) of 2016. The said writ petition was filed by the Kolkata Municipal Corporation (KMC) challenging the notification issued by the Ministry of Labour and Employment dated 8th January, 2011 in exercise of powers conferred under Clause (b) of Sub-Section (3) of Section 1 of the Employees’ Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1962 (the EPF Act) thereby, the Central Government specified that the Municipal Councils and Municipal Corporations constituted under Sub-Clauses (b) and (c) of Clause 1 of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
