Pawan Kumar Sultania vs Union of India

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Rajesh Bindal, Aniruddha Roy, JJ
Pawan Kumar Sultania – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Surajit Nath Mitra, Mr. Reetobrata Mitra, Mr. Sankarshan Sarkar, Mr. Prangopal Das
For the Respondents: Mr. Prabal Kumar Mukherjee, Mr. Ashok Kumar Jena

Table of Content
1. facts surrounding appellant's eviction and goods in public premises. (Para 1 , 6)
2. appellant claims rights as tenant while facing eviction. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
3. arguments about improper notice and dispute over eviction process. (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
4. arguments regarding statutory notice and claim of possession. (Para 12 , 13)
5. court's observations on lawful actions taken by kpt. (Para 14 , 15)
6. court's finding regarding the legality of eviction and notice. (Para 16 , 17 , 18)
7. court ruled against allowance of claims by unauthorized occupants. (Para 19)
8. final decision dismissing the appeal. (Para 20)
9. final dismissal of appeal. (Para 21)

ORDER

1. The instant appeal has arisen from the impugned order dated January 28, 2021 passed by the Hon’ble Single Judge of this Court in IA 1 of 2017 (Old CAN 10033 of 2017) arising out of W.P.A. 24791 of 2017, by which the writ petition along with the interlocutory application filed therein was directed to appear on February 8, 2021 as “specially fixed matter” and the Kolkata Port Trust Authority (for short, ‘KPT’) was directed to cause an enquiry into the matter and apprice the Hon’ble Single Bench as to why no positive action

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

Rajesh Bindal, Aniruddha Roy, JJPawan Kumar Sultania – AppellantVersusUnion of India – Respondent

Rajesh Bindal, Aniruddha Roy, JJ
Pawan Kumar Sultania – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent