2023 Supreme(Online)(CAL) 10323
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT - APPELLATE SIDE
DR BHUBANDEEP MUKHOPADHYAY – Appellant
Versus
SUDESHNA MUKHOPADHYAY – Respondent
CO 3816/2022
10.01.2023
Item No.11
Ct. No.7
CHC
(disposed of)
C.O. 3816 of 2022
Dr. Bhubandeep Mukhopadhyay
C & C R
Vs.
Smt. Sudeshna Mukhopadhyay
Mr. Suhrid Sur
…for the petitioner
Mr. Tanmoy Chowdhury,
Ms. Ritoprita Ghosh
…for the opposite party
Adverting attention to order dated 25th November,
2019, passed in Misc. Case No.45 of 2019, permitting
transfer of Matrimonial Suit No.908 of 2012
(renumbered as Mat. Suit No.469 of 2013) and Mat.
Suit No.568 of 2018, Mr. Suhrid Sur, learned
advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that
both the suits mentioned above have already been
transferred from the court of learned Additional
District Judge, 1st Court, Serampore to learned
Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court,
Chandernagore for the speedy disposal.
As per submission disclosed by the petitioner
whenever both these Matrimonial Suits have been
directed to be transferred to transferee court, all the
pending applications together with Misc. Cases, if any
connected therewith, have to be transferred to the
transferee court, otherwise there may be conflict of
opinions in the event of Misc. Case filed by either of
the parties to this case being decided by different
courts.
Per contra, Mr. Chowdhury, learned advocate
appearing for the opposite party submits that the
Misc. Case filed before Serampore Court by the wife
should be allowed to be continued before the
transferor court, because the lis of Misc. Case as well
as the lis of Matrimonial Suit is quite different, and
this should be considered in different perspective.
Having considered the submission of both sides,
the Court is not prepared to accept the submission as
advanced by the learned advocate for the opposite
party/wife, the reason being is that whenever both
the suits have already been transferred to
Chandernagore Court to Serampore Court, all the
applications and the Misc. Cases filed connected with
those two Mat Suits, mentioned hereinabove, have to
be taken up by the transferee court.
While taking up such interlocutory application in
both the Mat. Suits including Misc. Case, appropriate
opportunity of hearing should however, be extended
to both the parties.
When there is nothing available at the moment
that the order passed under Section 24 C.P.C. has
2
been challenged before any superior forum at this
stage, the pending Misc. Cases should not be allowed
to be continued by the transferor court, i.e.Serampore
Court. The Misc. Case along with connected
interlocutory applications, if there be any, still left
untransmitted to the transferee court, same may be
transferred to the transferee court within three weeks
from the date of communication of this order upon
notice to the opposite party.
The revisional application stands disposed of.
The amount, however, granted by the transferee
court before the order of transfer under Section 24
C.P.C. will however remain alive.
Parties are directed to make communication of this
order to the court below.
Urgent certified photostat copy of this order, if
applied for, be given to the parties as expeditiously as
possible on compliance of all necessary formalities.
(Subhasis Dasgupta, J.)
3