Sugato Majumdar, J
NILANCHAL GRIH NIRMAN LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
SUSOVAN BANERJEE – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiffs assert defamation claims stemming from a letter circulated by defendants. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. defendants contest the suit, arguing the letter was protective in nature. (Para 4 , 6) |
The plaint case in nutshell is that the Plaintiffs are companies registered under Companies Act 1956. The Plaintiffs as members of a consortium lead by the Plaintiff No.1 have acquired goodwill and reputation as promoters and developers. They have completed various projects in or around the city of Kolkata. For the purpose of developing and promoting a housing project the Plaintiffs acquired along with its associated group of companies, ownership and possession of premises no. 7D/1, 7D/2 and 7D/3, Anil Moitra Sarani, Kolkata in terms of registered deed of P a g e | 2 conveyances. Names of the Plaintiffs were also mutated as co-owners of the said premises in the records of Kolkata Municipal Corporation. Sanctioned plans were also obtained from Kolkata Municipal Corporation for construction of building.
It is averred in the plaint that the Defendants with intent to affect the reputation and goodwill of the Plaintiffs sent a letter da
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.