SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 7156

HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Hon`ble Dr Justice VINEET KOTHARI
THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU – Appellant
Versus
TVL. THE KUMARAN MILLS LIMIT – Respondent


O R D E R

(Order of the Court was made by DR.VINEET KOTHARI,J.)

The State has filed this Writ Petition, aggrieved by the order passed by the Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal (Additional Bench) dated 27.03.2003, whereby the learned Tribunal allowed the Appeal of the Assessee, holding that the transaction in question amounted to branch transfer made by the Assessee which was duly supported by Form-F which was duly verified during the Assessment proceedings and therefore, there was no question of Revision/Re- assessment for want of compliance with the terms under Rule 4 (3-A) of the Central Sales Tax Rules. The relevant findings of the Tribunal are quoted below for ready reference:

"28. The Department has not pointed out any discrepancy in the Form F declarations to render them as unacceptable. The authorities below have not established that there is a movement of goods against a particular order of direction in order to impose tax under Section 3 (a) of the CST Act, 1956. The grounds for rejection of the claim relying on certain clauses in the agreement read in isolation and relying on payment received in advance and sale made on the same day are not in accordance with law and a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top