SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1

CRA No. 862/2011

Ramswaroop & Ors. Vs. The State of MP

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

BENCH AT GWALIOR

DIVISION

BENCH:

BEFORE: G.S. AHLUWALIA

&

RAJEEV KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA, JJ.

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 862/2011

Ramswaroop & Others

Vs.

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Shri Ashok Kumar Jain, learned counsel for the appellants.

Shri C.P. Singh, learned counsel for the respondent/State.

Reserved on

:

28th April, 2022.

Whether approved for reporting

:

Yes/______

J U D G M E N T

(Passed on 09/05/2022)

Per

Rajeev Kumar Shrivastava, J.:

The present Criminal Appeal u/S 374 of CrPC has been

preferred by appellants Ramswaroop, Ramesh and Hemant,

assailing the impugned judgment of conviction and order of

sentence dated 28-09-2011 passed by Additional Sessions Judge,

Chachoda, Distt.Guna (MP) in Sessions Trial No.256/2008

whereby the appellants have been convicted u/S 302/34 of IPC

(two counts) and sentenced to undergo Life Imprisonment with

fine of Rs.1,000/- for commission of murder of Kallu and Shivlal

2

CRA No. 862/2011

Ramswaroop & Ors. Vs. The State of MP

and u/S 323/34 of IPC (four counts) and sentenced to undergo six

months RI with default stipulations for causing injuries to four

injured persons. Both the sentenced were directed to be run

concurrently.

(2)

In a nutshell, the case of prosecution is that around 4– 6

months ago from the date of incident 10.06.2008, the Dynamo of

appellant No.1 Ramswaroop was stolen and on 10.06.2008, the

accused persons were arguing with Kallu (since deceased) and

others suspecting them for theft of Dynamo and for resolving the

dispute, Nathu Patel and Dheeraj Meena were called by accused

persons. During the incident, at around 12.00 noon, when Kallu

and Dheeraj were leaving the place then, all of a sudden, the

appellants, who were filling their trolley of manure, asked for

dynamo or Rs.40,000/- from the complainant party and

thereafter, appellant No.1 Ramswaroop inflicted axe blow upon

the head of Kallu with intention to kill him and appellant No.2

Ramesh inflicted lathi blow on the head of Kallu and when

Shivlal came to rescue him, then appellant No.3 Hemant inflicted

spade blow as a result whereof, blood started oozing and Karibai

(PW1) as well as complainant Mahendra Singh Meena (PW8)

along with Dheeraj (PW2) and Ishwar (PW4) were beaten when

they intervened the matter. On receiving information of the said

incident, the police reached spot and thereafter, injured along

with Shivlal & Kallu were brought to the hospital. Shivlal died

3

CRA No. 862/2011

Ramswaroop & Ors. Vs. The State of MP

on the spot while Kallu died on the way while bringing him to

Kumbhraj Hospital. The dead body of both deceased thereafter

were sent for postmortem. Complainant Mahendra Singh Meena

(PW8) lodged a complaint Exhibit P8, on the basis of which FIR

at Crime No.160/2008 for offence under Sections 302, 307, 324,

323/34 of IPC was registered against accused persons. The

matter was investigated and after completion of investigation and

other formalities, the police filed a charge-sheet u/S 302/34 of

IPC (two counts) and u/S 323/34 of IPC (four counts) against

accused appellants

(3)

The accused persons were charged with aforesaid offence

which was abjured by them and claimed for trial. In their

defence, they pleaded that they have been falsely implicated and

on the alleged date of incident, they were not present at the place

of occurrence. Appellants have got examined Rambharose (DW-

1), Ramhet (DW-2) and Badrilal (DW-3) in their defence.

(4)

Prosecution, in order to prove its case, examined as many

as thirteen witnesses viz. PW1 Karibai, PW2 Dheeraj Singh,

PW3

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top