SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT JABALPUR

BEFORE

HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE ANJULI PALO

CIVIL REVISION NO. 273 OF 2021

Between:-

Siddharth Patel

S/o Late Shri Parmanand Bhai Patel

aged about 68 years, occupation – Business

R/o 933, Gol Bazar, Jabalpur (M.P.)

…….Applicant/Defendant No. 2

(By Shri Gaurav Bhatia, Senior Counsel assisted by Shri

Devendra Chouhan, Shri Abhinav Deshwal, Shri Chaitanya

Dhruv and Shri Anurag Tiwari, Advocates)

AND

Smt. Jyotsna Devi

Widow of Late Shri Parmanand Bhai Patel

aged about 90 years at demise,

Resided at 30 Shreyas, 5th Floor,

Opposite AIR, India, Nariman Point, Mumbai

(Deceased)

……...Respondent/Plaintiff

(Since deceased)

1.

Shri Shravan Bhai Patel,

S/o Late Shri Parmanand Bhai Patel,

aged about 75 years, R/o 933, Gol Bazar,

Jabalpur (M.P.)

…………...Defendant No. 1

2.

Dr. Neena Patel

Wife of Dr. vinay Bhai Patel,

-2-

aged about 76 years,

R/o 31, Gemdiya Road, Pedar Road

Mumbai (Maharashtra)

…………...Defendant No. 3.

3.

Dr. Rupa Patel

D/o Late Shri Parmanand Bhai Patel

aged about 66 years,

R/o 30, Shreyas, 5th Floor,

Opposite Air, India, Nariman Point,

Mumbai (Maharashtra)

…………...Defendant No. 4.

4.

Dr. Sonal K. Amin

Wife of Shri Kiran Bhai Amin

aged about 71 years,

R/o 7/11, University Road

Pachpedhi, Jabalpur (M.P.)

…………...Defendant No. 5.

5.

Shri Pranav Patel

S/o Shri Shravan Bhai Patel

aged about 48 years,

R/o 933, Gol Bazar

Jabalpur (M.P.)

…………...Defendant No. 6.

6.

Kohinoor Tobacco Private Limited,

903, Mohan Lal Hargovind Das Bhawan

Gol Bazarm, Through its Directors

Shri Lalit Patel, Office-903, M.H. House,

Gol Bazar, Jabalpur (M.P.)

…………...Defendant No. 7.

7.

State of Madhya Pradesh

Through Collector, District Jabalpur

Jabalpur (M.P.)

-3-

…………...Defendant No. 8.

(Respondent No. 1 by Shri Sudhir Kumar Sharma, Advocate)

(Respondent No. 2 by Shri Kunal Vajani with Shri Devashish Sakalkar

and Shri Shubhang Tondon, Advocates)

(Respondent No. 6 by Shri Bhanu Pratap singh with Shri Ankur

Shrivastava, Advocate)

__________________________________________________________

Order reserved on

:

22.06.2022

Order passed on

:

05.07.2022

__________________________________________________________

This revision coming on for admission this day, the Court passed

the following judgment:-

O R D E R

1.

The applicant/defendant No. 2 has filed this revision being

aggrieved by order (Annexure A-20) dated 3.8.2021 passed by the

District Judge (28th), Jabalpur in R.C.S. No. 800023/2015 whereby the

applications filed by defendant No. 3 under Order 23 Rule 1A of Code of

Civil Procedure and under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC read with Section 151

CPC have been allowed permitting her to be transposed as plaintiff; the

application filed by defendant No. 7 Kohinoor Tabacco Private Limited

for dismissing the suit as abated has been dismissed and the application

-4-

filed by defendant No. 1 under Order 22 Rule 4A read with Order 22

Rule 5 CPC has been dismissed.

2.

The facts giving rise to this revision are that plaintiff Jyotsna Devi

Patel filed a suit bearing R.C.S. No. 23A/2015 on 16.4.2015 for partition

and separate possession of House No. 933, New No. 908, Gol Bazar,

Jabalpur and 1/5th share in respect of the agricultural land bearing

Survey No. 55, 64, 68, 79, 84, 118, 117/3, 119/2, 165, 167, 173/1, 172/1,

189/3, 189/1, 203/5 and 86/3 total area 60.52 hectare i.e. 149.56 acres

situated at village Baderakala, P.C. 27, Tahsil Panagar, District Jabalpur

including the houses constructed thereon against the defendants, who are

her sons, daughters and grand son. The applicant/defendant No. 1 and

defendant No. 2 are the sons, defendant Nos. 3, 4 and 5 are the daughters

of the plaintiff and defendant No. 7 is a registered company which is in

physical possession of a portion of the suit House No. 933 as bonafide

purchaser as per registered sale-deed dated 14.4.1972 executed by

Parmanand Bhai Patel and plaintiff Smt. Jyotsna Devi Patel.

3.

In the aforesaid civil suit, defendant No

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top