NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI (APPELLATE JURISDICTION)

IA No. 135/2022 in Company Appeal (AT) (CH) (Ins) No. 63/2022 (IA Nos. 133, 134/2022)

(Filed under Rule 11 of the NCLAT Rules, 2016)

In the matter of:

Eastern Power Distribution Company of Andhra Pradesh Ltd.

…Appellant V Bodugu Sudhakar & 2 Ors. …Respondents Present :

For Appellant : Mr. Rakesh K Sharma, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Aakanksha Nehra &

Mr. Sandeep Bajaj, Advocates, For R1 & R2 Mr. Sachin Sharma, Advocate For Y. Suryanarayana, Advocate, For R3

ORDER

(Virtual Mode)

24/04/2023:

‘Heard’ the Learned Counsel for the ‘Petitioner’/ ‘Appellant’, in IA No. 135 of 2022, in Company Appeal (AT) (CH) (Ins) No. 63 of 2022.

According to the ‘Petitioner’/ ‘Appellant’, he was not a Party to the ‘Impugned Proceedings’ in IA(IBC) No. 499 of 2021, in C.P.(IB)No. 346/7/HDB/2018, before the ‘Adjudicating Authority’/ ‘National Company Law Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench, Hyderabad’, dated 14/10/2021. In this connection, it is the contention of the ‘Petitioner’/ ‘Appellant’, that the leave to prefer the instant Company Appeal (AT) (CH)

(Ins) No. 63 of 2022, is sought by the ‘Petitioner’/ ‘Appellant’, because of the fact that in sim