SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL
COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI
 
First Appeal No. A/07/133
(Arisen out of Order Dated 19/12/2006 in Case No. 125/2005 of District Thane)
 
1. M/s. Shree Sai Developers
109, Bharat Industrial Estate, L.B.S. Marg, Bhandup (W), Mumbai 400 078.
Mumbai
Maharashtra
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Shri. Vinayak V. Bidwai
102, Building No. A/2, Golden Park Complex, Near Golden Daiz Junction, L.B.S. Marg, Opp. Navnit Motors, Thane (W) - 400 601.
Thane
Maharashtra
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 Hon'ble Mr. S.R. Khanzode PRESIDING MEMBER
 Hon'ble Mr. Narendra Kawde MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
Appellant and its counsel absent.
Mrs.Bidwani for the respodent present.
......for the Appellant
 
ORDER

(Per Shri S.R.Khanzode, Hon’ble Presiding Judicial Member)

 

(1)               Respondent absent, but his wife is present and submitted an application on behalf of the respondent.  Appellant and its counsel are remaining absent, in spite of notice published on Notice Board of the Commission, Bar and internet as well as by way of abundant precaution intimation given by post on 28/02/2012.  Under the circumstances, the appeal stands dismissed for default. 

Pronounced



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top