SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

.f IlI

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION'

ODISHA, CUTTACK

FIRST APPEAL NO.I 3Il2OI 1

(Frorn an order dated 18.01 .2011 passed by the District

Forurt, Mayurbhanj, Baripada in Consumer Complaint

No.6912007)

1- Orissa Goods Carriage, Balasore,

Represented through its Branch Manager,

At-Januganj Golai,PO/PS/Dist- Balasore.

2-Branch Manageq Head Office,

Orissa Goods Carriage, Cuttack Branch,

At-Professor Pada, PS/PS/Di st-Cuttack.

3- Orissa Goods Carriage, Baripada Branch,

At-Ambika Sahi,PO/PS- Baripada,

Dist-Mayurbhanj

...APPellants

-Vrs.-

1- Smritikana Das @Pyne

Wo.Late Sunil Kumar Pyne

Proprietor Pyne & Pyne

At- Lalbazar, Near M.P.K.Girls High School,

PO/PS- Baripada, Dist-Mayurbhanj.

U4

a

2- Manager, Blow Plast Ltd., Cuttack.

Madhusudan Avenue, Bij upattnaik Chowk,

AtlPO/Dist-Cuttack.

... Respondents.

Counsel for the Appellants:- Sri Suvendu Ku, Ray and Sri Siva Prasad

Swain,

Counsel for the Respondents- Sri Anjan Kumar Biswal, Sri P'K'Rout,Sri

D.R.Das,

Date of Hearing- 30.08.2022

Date of Order- 02.09.2022

ORDER

Sri P.K.Prustv, Member

The case of the complainant is that the complainant

being thc authorised dealer of Aristocrat Brand luggage posesses a

showroom in the name and style as "Pyne & Pyne" at Lalbazar , Baripada

who purchased 17 cartoons of Aristocrat suitcases worth Rs. 67,550/ from

O.P No.4 and got it transported through O.P No.2 ( Orissa Goods Carriage'

cuttack Branch) to o.P .3 ( Orissa Goods carriage, Baripada Branch ) to be

collected at Baripada vide consignment bearing No. 1599 dt'20'4'2006'

t"L

vj

-3-

As the consignment bearing no. 1599 Dt. 20-04-2006,

corresponding to the invoice cum-delivery challan No. 236, Dl12-04-2006

not reached at its destination in time, the complainant sent a notice under

section of 10 of carrier Act 1865, which was received by all the o.Ps

except O.P No.2 but in vain.

challenging the inaction of o.Ps the complainant filed

this case praying for a direction to the O.Ps either to deliver the

consignment or to refund the value of goods worth Rs.67,660/- along with

with 18% interest & Rs. 30,000/- towards harassment & mental agony &

Rs. 2000/- towards cost.

The O.P No.L, 2&3 appeared through their counsels &

submitted written version. The O.Ps 1.,2 & 3 stated that the complainant is

not a consumer since he has not hired the services of these o.Ps and the

case is not maintainable under C.P Act since written notice u/s 10 of

Carrier Act has not been served on them stating the full particulars of the

consignment booked with invoice & related documents by registered post

within 30 days of the booking .

t\ue-

-4-

o.P No.4 appeared separately through its counsels. lt admits

to have sent L7 cartoons of Aristocrat Luggage worth Rs' 67600/- vide

consignment no. 1599 to the complainant which was entrusted to O'P

No.2 (Orissa Goods Carriage, Cuttack) to be delivered to the complainant -

consignee at BariPada.

After hearing the parties, the learned forum below passed

the impugned order directing the O.P 1,2 &3 to deliver the consignment

as per the annexure 2& 3 or to refund Rs. 67660/- with t2%inlerest from

the date of consignment i.e 23-05-2006, further learned forum below also

directed to pay Rs. 15,000/- towards harassment and mental agony and Rs'

2OOO/- towards cost within 30 days from the date of receipt of the order,

failing which 18 % interest over the entire awarded money would be

charged till the date of PaYment.

Challenging the impugned order the appellant has filed this

appeal. During the course of hearing, learned counsel of appellant

submitted that in the present case even though Respondent No'1( after

reaching the said consignment at Baripada) received all goods related to

\".-

-5-

the consignment from the appellant transporter by endorsing the register

maintained by the transporter on the relevant date but not deposled the

copies of the consignment at the

appellant transporter wrote various

deposit the said consignment copies '

end of the month, for which the

letters to th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top