SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1 Appeal No.1476/2019

Date of Filing :24.10.2019

Date of Disposal :06.09.2021

BEFORE THE KARNATAKA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES

REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BENGALURU (PRINCIPAL BENCH)

DATED THIS THE 06thDAY OF SEPTEMBER-2021

PRESENT

Mr. K.B.SANGANNANAVAR : JUDICIAL MEMBER

MrsM.DIVYASHREE : LADY MEMBER

APPEAL NO.1476/2019

Dr. SabitaW/oVinodKallianpurkar,

Aged about 60 Years, Occ:Medical

Practitioner/Obstetrics & Gynecologist,

R/o: Kallianpurkar Nursing Home,

Shri Krishna KalyanMantap Road,

Geshpande Nagar, Hubballi-580 029.

..Appellant

(By Sri/Smt. R.V.Itagi, Advocate)

1. Shreepada S/o DattatreyaKulkarni,

Aged about 44 Years, Occ:Advocate,

R/o: No.14, Priyadarshini Colony,

Gokul Road, Hubballi-580 030.

2. Akash S/o ShreepadaKularani,

Aged about 13 years, Occ:Student,

R/o: No.14, Priyadarshini Colony,

Gokul Road, Hubballi-580 030.

3. Bhoomika D/o ShreepadaKularni,

Aged about 09 years, Occ:Student,

R/o: No.14, Priyadarshini Colony,

Gokul Road, Hubballi-580 030.

..Respondents

(In-person)

2 Appeal No.1476/2019

O R D E R

Mr. K.B.SANGANNANAVAR : JUDICIAL MEMBER

1. This is an Appeal filed u/s 27-A of Consumer Protection Act,

1986 by JDR/OP in E.A.No.57/2015, on the file of District

Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Dharwar, aggrieved by

the order dated 07.11.2019 passed by the said Forum (for short

District Forum and the parties arrayed as in E.A).

2. The facts in brief: DHR being a consumer raised complaint

No.180/2008 before the Forum below, alleging deficiency of

medical service on the part of the JDR, relating to deceased wife

of DHR/Respondent No.1 and Mother of Respondent Nos.2 and

3, respectively. The said complaint was enquired into by the

Forum below and held appellant herein found to be failed to

provide proper medical service, resulting thereby death of wife

was occurred, thereby directed appellant/Doctor to pay

compensation of Rs.3,00,000/- and Rs.5,000/- towards cost of

litigation within one month, failing which such amount carry

interest @ 8% p.a from the date of order till its realization by its

order dated; 25.03.2009.

3 Appeal No.1476/2019

3. Being aggrieved by the aforesaid order, appellant herein and

the respondent preferred appeal and cross appeal before this

Commission. The Commission had heard both appeals and

dismissed both the appeals confirming the order of the Forum

below.

4. Being aggrieved by the aforesaid order, both preferred

R.P.No.692/2010 and 3013/2011 respectively before the

Hon’ble National Commission and the Hon’ble National

Commission, while affirming the orders of District Forum and

State Commission, enhanced compensation to the extent of

Rs.15,00,000/- in addition to the compensation already

awarded by the Forum below by an order dated 28.05.2015 in

R.P.No.3013/2011 and dismissed R.P.No.692/2010, further

held respondents herein are entitle for cost of Rs.25,000/- and

directed to release Rs.2,00,000/- deposited by appellant herein

in favour of the respondents and the balance amount due to be

paid in terms of the order passed by National Commission shall

be paid by the appellant to the respondent No.1 within six

weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the order, failing

which amount due to be payable shall carry interest @ 9% p.a

from the date of filing the complaint till actual payment.

4 Appeal No.1476/2019

5. Finally, the appellant has preferred SLP before the Hon’ble Apex

Court in SLP (Civil) No.25939/25940 of 2015, which also came

to be dismissed

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top